Descartes

 

In our class reading, "Descartes" we are introduced to the science behind the human emotions and laughter. Philosophical thinker, Descartes makes a controversial point that laughter usually stems from a place of ridicule and scorn. Even the laughter that stems from joy is because there are small traces of scorn attached to it. Furthermore, Descartes leaves us with, "And it is not wrong to laugh when we hear the jests of another; these jests may even be such that it would be difficult not to laugh at them; but when we ourselves jest, it is more fitting to abstain form laughter, in order not to seem to be surprised by the things that are said, nor to wonder at the ingenuity we show in inventing them. And that makes those who hear them all the more surprised" (Descartes 25). I think this idea is the most thought-provoking of them all, as I apply Descartes' philosophies to real life. How come we are so comfortable laughing at others, yet become sensitive and defensive once we are the one being laughed at? I think most individuals struggle with being "the butt" of the joke. It's hard to have our flaws put on display to poke fun at, but it's okay to tease your friend for how they acted last Saturday night. After reading this portion of the text, I immediately thought of an episode of NBC's "The Office". In one particular episode, protagonist Michael Scott holds a "roast" where he makes fun of his fellow coworkers. Yet, once it's Michael's turn to be roasted, he immediately storms off and cannot find the humor in his coworkers' jokes. This fictional episode not only relates to Descartes, but also our humanly instincts. It's easy to laugh at others and notice their flaws, but there is something about having our own flaws exposed that crosses a line. Maybe it's because we think others close to us don't notice what makes us imperfect–it's easier thinking that the ones closest to you see no fault, but that isn't reality. None of us are perfect, so by nature, we are made to be laughed at. Whether it be falling off the treadmill at the gym, or saying something embarrassing to your crush, we are human and therefore full of mistakes. Honestly, we would not be normal if there is nothing to laugh about or poke fun of about ourselves. Laughter breeds from imperfection. In my personal experiences, I have been okay at being teased and laughed at by my friends. This is a skill I've built up over time. I recognize the imperfect things about me, and that's okay. I'm made up of lots of things to laugh at, but many more things to love. While yes, Descartes is right and our laughter comes from this weird and inner place of ridicule and scorn, it's natural. Humans are wired to laugh at others, so we have to embrace it. It's important that we also open ourselves to poking fun at ourselves. It's okay not to be perfect and laugh at ourselves. Shit happens and looking back on it, it will probably make a really funny story. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hamilton's understanding of National Time

Lin-Manual Miranda’s masterful hip-hop musical, Hamilton , eloquently ties together time theories that show the impact time’s understanding has on the development of a character and the motivation behind their actions.  Miranda’s work could not avoid discussion of the implications of understanding time, as he draws on history with his own lens, exposing his personal beliefs in time.  Miranda draws on national time in consideration of the creation of the United States, developing an understanding of the U.S.’s construction with a more modern and diverse perspective. The understanding of national time within this musical is seen through the creation of the nation, and Miranda’s understanding of ‘double time’ that was not considered in America’s history.  The U.S. Constitution was not written with consideration for those who were not experiencing life the same way as those writing it.  It did not consider the humanity of slaves, Native Americans, or women, who all experienced (and continu
Read more

Stability of "Creative Solitude"

     Every member of the Bechdel family household lives in their own world.  Alison's father lives in a trapped world--living in the same town and hiding his true sexuality--though he seeks stability in restoring their Victorian home and expressing himself through literature.  For instance, on page 13, there is an image of her father recording his voice to describe the influences on the house's design: "This owner changed the roofs, the porches, the chimneys, the fireplaces, the walls, the woodwork, until it became a stylish town house suitable for a prosperous lawyer's family."  His focus obsessively draws his attention and focus to the past, as he attempts to piece together the home's story.  This also alludes to his obsession with literature, as he chooses to live in a world different from his own reality, in order to escape his trapped life.     In addition to Alison's father, her mother, too, has her own sense of "creative solitude" (p. 133)
Read more

Home in Others

      Woodson’s own concept of home, I feel, evolves throughout the story’s progression. In the beginning, she is very focused on places and the feelings they provoke. Her geographical position greatly impacts her and the other characters’ mood, feelings of belonging and coincidentally, their comfort levels, which, in turn, all impact behavior. It is true that Jackie and her family must behave differently depending on their location. For example, take their obvious demeanor and mannerism change as the children make those journeys from North to South.       However, I would submit that Jackie’s concept of home takes on a less tangible form later in the story. While she does notice the comforting, home-like vibrations radiated from her various family members, the two remained coincidental until the climax of the book, aligning with Jackie’s increased self-awareness. She finds feelings of “home” and belonging while thinking of people, while reading, and in some way while she’s projecting
Read more