Danny As Immigrant Prototype

 As addressed in the first half of the novel, the main character, Danny, is currently illegally residing in Sydney, Australia. While Sydney has provided him with not only opportunities that were not allotted to him elsewhere, it also introduced him to the love of his life - so essentially what could be wrong? 

Essentially, Danny's living in Sydney could be best understood by the commonly used phrase, "hiding in plain sight" - simply put, if he looks like he fits in, then who is to question his being there. While there are seemingly no issues at the beginning of the text, the audience soon learns of a crime Danny witnesses, thus making him a key eye-witness in helping solve the mystery. While a typical Sydney resident would take this information to the authorities, the very nature of Danny attempting to bring justice to another citizen, could ultimately cause him to lose his own. Thus leading the audience into the second part of the novel leaving them to question Danny's ultimate fate. 

With this being said, this plot line not only addresses Danny's issue, within himself, but also presents the audience with a moral dilemma that causes them to step into his shoes in order to better understand the way in which he or she may act if faced with a similar situation. Simply put, would one's conscience drive them to tell the truth, even if it could ultimately cost them any sense of freedom and liberty they ever had?

In saying this, this issue could thus be better understood by placing it into the realm of American politics, especially in regards to immigrations and acceptance of beings viewed as the 'other'. For instance, towards the beginning of the Trump presidency, Trump, himself, made comments and active plans of building a wall, thus barring all those seeking freedom from any chances of ever gaining such a liberty. Ultimately, politics, such as this, choose to only embody love and respect for those that are similar to oneself, rather than being willing to learning cultures and ways of life other than one's own. With this being said, this text, specifically, Danny, continually caused me to refer back to American politics and step into the shoes of the 'other' to better understand the hardships they face not only in their own country, but in trying to make a better life for themselves, elsewhere. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Descartes

  In our class reading, "Descartes" we are introduced to the science behind the human emotions and laughter. Philosophical thinker, Descartes makes a controversial point that laughter usually stems from a place of ridicule and scorn. Even the laughter that stems from joy is because there are small traces of scorn attached to it. Furthermore, Descartes leaves us with, "And it is not wrong to laugh when we hear the jests of another; these jests may even be such that it would be difficult not to laugh at them; but when we ourselves jest, it is more fitting to abstain form laughter, in order not to seem to be surprised by the things that are said, nor to wonder at the ingenuity we show in inventing them. And that makes those who hear them all the more surprised" (Descartes 25). I think this idea is the most thought-provoking of them all, as I apply Descartes' philosophies to real life. How come we are so comfortable laughing at others, yet become sensitive and defen...
Read more

"Let it Snow"

The chapter, "Let it Snow" by Sedaris, is yet another example as to why Sedaris' book is not what it seems. My expectation for this chapter was for Sedaris to reflect on a childhood snow day spent with his siblings. Rather, Sedaris tells us the comical, yet troubling, account of a snow day spent trapped outside his house. Clearly feeling overwhelmed and exhausted from the pressure of having to entertain children during a blizzard, Sedaris’ mother takes an atypical approach to parenting–locking her children out of the house. “Selfish mothers wanted the house to themselves, and their children were discovered years later, frozen like mastodons in blocks of ice” (Sedaris 88). Sedaris and his siblings respond to their mother’s cold heart by having their sister Tiffany lay in the street, hoping she’ll get hit by a car, which will of course, teach their mother a lesson. The chapter ends with Sedaris’ mother trudging outside in no snow gear to go and get them, and the children as...
Read more

Portrayal contributes to Perception

 In the poems written by Smith and Sanchez, readers are confronted with a clear theme: the need for social change.  However, both poems take different approaches in commenting on this issue, as "Dinosaurs in the Hood" focuses on portrayal in the media in acting on double-time, and "For Sweet Honey in the Rock" focuses on a more urgent form of double-time.   Smith's poem develops the characteristics of an ideal movie--an ideal fictional, yet revolutionary cinematic narrative.  Like Sanchez' poem, which is more directly about a battleground, this film he describes is like a revolution: "where a cop car gets pooped on by a pterodactyl, a scene / where the corner store turns into a battle ground" (stanza 2).  Smith imagines a movie that "is not a vehicle for Will Smith and Sofia Vergara" (stanza 3), which suggests that it needs to be relatable and a social commentary on the social challenges/inequalities of minorities in society.  He also ass...
Read more